英語(yǔ)資源頻道為大家整理的china daily 雙語(yǔ)新聞：小說(shuō)愛(ài)好者更富創(chuàng)造力 ，供大家閱讀參考。
從心理學(xué)上說(shuō)，“封閉式認(rèn)知”是指人們有意于消除模糊的概念，獲得確定的結(jié)論，而這有時(shí)是不理智的，可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致負(fù)面的決定和倉(cāng)促的判斷。
Psychologically, "closed cognition" refers to people interested in eliminating fuzzy concept, obtain the conclusion, which is sometimes irrational, may lead to negative decisions and rush to judgment.
該研究注意到，對(duì)“封閉式認(rèn)知”的需求會(huì)導(dǎo)致人們?cè)讷@取知識(shí)的過(guò)程中抓取早先的理論，并將思維僵化在這個(gè)抓取的理論中，而對(duì)其他的信息充耳不聞。這將會(huì)影響理性思考和創(chuàng)新性思維。
To note that this study, on the "closed cognitive" demand could lead to people in the process of acquiring knowledge grasping earlier theories, and the rigidity of thinking in the capture theory, and to turn a deaf ear to other information. This will affect the rational thinking and creative thinking.
研究將100名參與者分成兩組，一組給了八篇包括蕭伯納在內(nèi)的名作者的散文，另一組則給了同等的作者的短篇小說(shuō)來(lái)閱讀。
Study 100 participants were divided into two groups, one group to eight articles including Bernard Shaw, author of the prose, another group to the equally famous writer of short stories to read.
讀畢，參與者們通過(guò)填寫(xiě)調(diào)查問(wèn)卷來(lái)衡量其對(duì)于確定性和穩(wěn)定性的需求。研究顯示閱讀短篇小說(shuō)的人比閱讀散文的人得分低了很多，這說(shuō)明閱讀小說(shuō)的人對(duì)于穩(wěn)定性和確定性沒(méi)有太大需求。
Complete, the participants to measure its demand for certainty and stability by filling out a questionnaire. Research shows that reading short stories of people than reading prose scored much lower, suggesting that reading the novel is not much demand for stability and certainty.
“人們沉浸在小說(shuō)的閱讀中時(shí)，不需要將思維引導(dǎo)到一個(gè)結(jié)論中去，”該研究報(bào)告稱(chēng)，這也暗示了有閱讀習(xí)慣的人們比不閱讀的人群更能坦然面對(duì)模棱兩可的事物。
"People are immersed in reading novels, does not need to be thinking led to a conclusion," the report says, it also suggests that people have the habit of reading can calm in the face of ready to accept either course things more than reading the crowd.
從心理學(xué)上說(shuō)，“封閉式認(rèn)知”是指人們有意于消除模糊的概念，獲得確定的結(jié)論，而這有時(shí)是不理智的，可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致負(fù)面的決定和倉(cāng)促的判斷。
Psychologically, "closed cognition" refers to people interested in eliminating fuzzy concept, obtain the conclusion, which is sometimes irrational, may lead to negative decisions and rush to judgment.
該研究注意到，對(duì)“封閉式認(rèn)知”的需求會(huì)導(dǎo)致人們?cè)讷@取知識(shí)的過(guò)程中抓取早先的理論，并將思維僵化在這個(gè)抓取的理論中，而對(duì)其他的信息充耳不聞。這將會(huì)影響理性思考和創(chuàng)新性思維。
To note that this study, on the "closed cognitive" demand could lead to people in the process of acquiring knowledge grasping earlier theories, and the rigidity of thinking in the capture theory, and to turn a deaf ear to other information. This will affect the rational thinking and creative thinking.
研究將100名參與者分成兩組，一組給了八篇包括蕭伯納在內(nèi)的名作者的散文，另一組則給了同等的作者的短篇小說(shuō)來(lái)閱讀。
Study 100 participants were divided into two groups, one group to eight articles including Bernard Shaw, author of the prose, another group to the equally famous writer of short stories to read.
讀畢，參與者們通過(guò)填寫(xiě)調(diào)查問(wèn)卷來(lái)衡量其對(duì)于確定性和穩(wěn)定性的需求。研究顯示閱讀短篇小說(shuō)的人比閱讀散文的人得分低了很多，這說(shuō)明閱讀小說(shuō)的人對(duì)于穩(wěn)定性和確定性沒(méi)有太大需求。
Complete, the participants to measure its demand for certainty and stability by filling out a questionnaire. Research shows that reading short stories of people than reading prose scored much lower, suggesting that reading the novel is not much demand for stability and certainty.
“人們沉浸在小說(shuō)的閱讀中時(shí)，不需要將思維引導(dǎo)到一個(gè)結(jié)論中去，”該研究報(bào)告稱(chēng)，這也暗示了有閱讀習(xí)慣的人們比不閱讀的人群更能坦然面對(duì)模棱兩可的事物。
"People are immersed in reading novels, does not need to be thinking led to a conclusion," the report says, it also suggests that people have the habit of reading can calm in the face of ready to accept either course things more than reading the crowd.