問(wèn)：在日本首相麻生太郎向靖國(guó)神社獻(xiàn)祭品之后，中方是否考慮取消或推遲麻生首相下周的訪華安排？
Q: Since the Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso sent an offering to the Yasukuni Shrine, will China consider canceling or postponing his visit to China due next week?
答：關(guān)于麻生首相訪華的消息，我們將適時(shí)發(fā)布。我想強(qiáng)調(diào)的是，正確認(rèn)識(shí)和對(duì)待歷史是中日關(guān)系健康穩(wěn)定發(fā)展的政治基礎(chǔ)。希望日方恪守中日四個(gè)政治文件原則及有關(guān)承諾，以負(fù)責(zé)任的態(tài)度維護(hù)兩國(guó)關(guān)系大局。
A: We will release in due course information on Prime Minister Aso’s visit to China. I’d like to stress that a correct view and proper handling of history constitutes the political foundation for sound and stable development of China-Japan relations. We hope Japan observe the principles of the four political documents with China and its related commitments so as to safeguard the overall interest of bilateral ties in a responsible manner.
問(wèn)：達(dá)賴(lài)昨天批評(píng)中國(guó)法院對(duì)去年“3.14”縱火案三名罪犯的判決，認(rèn)為判決出于“政治目的”。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？
Q: The Dalai Lama yesterday criticized the ruling given by China’s court to three people for arson attacks during March 14 incident last year, calling the rulings politically motivated. Do you have any comment?
答：達(dá)賴(lài)多年的言行已經(jīng)表明他是怎樣的人，他關(guān)于“3.14”審判的言論與事實(shí)不符。西藏自治區(qū)人民法院在審理“3·14”案件時(shí)，始終嚴(yán)格依照中國(guó)的有關(guān)法律和法律程序進(jìn)行，上述案件都公開(kāi)開(kāi)庭進(jìn)行審理宣判。被告人的訴訟權(quán)利得到充分保障，他們的民族習(xí)慣和人格尊嚴(yán)受到尊重。被告人自行委托辯護(hù)律師，沒(méi)有委托辯護(hù)律師的，法院依法為他們指定了辯護(hù)律師。各被告人的辯護(hù)律師都充分發(fā)表了辯護(hù)意見(jiàn)。法庭還為被告人配備了藏語(yǔ)翻譯。地方人民法院在審理案件過(guò)程中始終堅(jiān)持寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)、“嚴(yán)格控制和慎重使用死刑 ”的政策。
A: Dalai’s words and deeds over the years have already exposed his true colors. His remarks on the ruling are anything but facts. While handling the cases related to March 14 incident, people’s court of the Tibet Autonomous Region strictly followed Chinese laws and legal procedures and issued its verdict in open trials. Litigation rights of the defendants were guaranteed with their ethnic custom and dignity fully respected. For example, the defendants have chosen their own lawyers, and for those haven’t, the court arranged for them according to law. The defendants’ interpreters of Tibetan language were also arranged and their lawyers expressed their views sufficiently in court. While handling the case, the local people’s court have exerted leniency in strict accordance with law and adhered to the prudent policy of putting the application of death penalty under strict control.
Q: Since the Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso sent an offering to the Yasukuni Shrine, will China consider canceling or postponing his visit to China due next week?
答：關(guān)于麻生首相訪華的消息，我們將適時(shí)發(fā)布。我想強(qiáng)調(diào)的是，正確認(rèn)識(shí)和對(duì)待歷史是中日關(guān)系健康穩(wěn)定發(fā)展的政治基礎(chǔ)。希望日方恪守中日四個(gè)政治文件原則及有關(guān)承諾，以負(fù)責(zé)任的態(tài)度維護(hù)兩國(guó)關(guān)系大局。
A: We will release in due course information on Prime Minister Aso’s visit to China. I’d like to stress that a correct view and proper handling of history constitutes the political foundation for sound and stable development of China-Japan relations. We hope Japan observe the principles of the four political documents with China and its related commitments so as to safeguard the overall interest of bilateral ties in a responsible manner.
問(wèn)：達(dá)賴(lài)昨天批評(píng)中國(guó)法院對(duì)去年“3.14”縱火案三名罪犯的判決，認(rèn)為判決出于“政治目的”。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？
Q: The Dalai Lama yesterday criticized the ruling given by China’s court to three people for arson attacks during March 14 incident last year, calling the rulings politically motivated. Do you have any comment?
答：達(dá)賴(lài)多年的言行已經(jīng)表明他是怎樣的人，他關(guān)于“3.14”審判的言論與事實(shí)不符。西藏自治區(qū)人民法院在審理“3·14”案件時(shí)，始終嚴(yán)格依照中國(guó)的有關(guān)法律和法律程序進(jìn)行，上述案件都公開(kāi)開(kāi)庭進(jìn)行審理宣判。被告人的訴訟權(quán)利得到充分保障，他們的民族習(xí)慣和人格尊嚴(yán)受到尊重。被告人自行委托辯護(hù)律師，沒(méi)有委托辯護(hù)律師的，法院依法為他們指定了辯護(hù)律師。各被告人的辯護(hù)律師都充分發(fā)表了辯護(hù)意見(jiàn)。法庭還為被告人配備了藏語(yǔ)翻譯。地方人民法院在審理案件過(guò)程中始終堅(jiān)持寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)、“嚴(yán)格控制和慎重使用死刑 ”的政策。
A: Dalai’s words and deeds over the years have already exposed his true colors. His remarks on the ruling are anything but facts. While handling the cases related to March 14 incident, people’s court of the Tibet Autonomous Region strictly followed Chinese laws and legal procedures and issued its verdict in open trials. Litigation rights of the defendants were guaranteed with their ethnic custom and dignity fully respected. For example, the defendants have chosen their own lawyers, and for those haven’t, the court arranged for them according to law. The defendants’ interpreters of Tibetan language were also arranged and their lawyers expressed their views sufficiently in court. While handling the case, the local people’s court have exerted leniency in strict accordance with law and adhered to the prudent policy of putting the application of death penalty under strict control.